It's not a surprise that the New York Times is endorsing Hillary Rodham Clinton for president today, but the reasons are worth reading.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-top-region®ion=opinion-c-col-top-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-top-region&_r=0
Reason itself is the key word here. Reason vs. bluster.
We have a choice: an experienced, sane candidate or a candidate whose comments and demeanor show that he is falling into dementia.
Compassion for this impaired candidate is important here, but voters also need to feel a sense responsibility for our nation. It's Hillary or innumerable disasters for all of us.
Note: I've not posted for most of August and September. Instead of following the election news, I've been traveling and living in a remote corner of Colorado at 10,000 ft,--and holding my breath until the election hoopla is over.
No comments:
Post a Comment